This is something that has been on my mind for quite a long time, and I think on most Americans. Health care, the signal most important issue that is apparently plaguing the Obama administration to this day. Here it goes, all my thoughts on it:
The first aspect of this debate is the extreme cost, I feel that I should lead with this one first so that I just can get it out-of-the-way instead of doing it later. In other words, the cost of this, is going to be extreme, the ‘estimates’ are around one trillion dollars, when the proposed bills are all accounted for.
But, that is just for right now, what about in the future? Costs are likely to rise, especially for a government program, one which has the mandate to try and bring health care to as many people as possible.
More people are going to be born.
More will likely move to these shores.
And health costs will go up now that everyone can get cured for everything…on someone else’s dime.
The mere fact of the matter is that the costs are so underestimated is due to two things. One it is slightly intentional, they do not want the people to know how much this is liable to cost them in the long run, especially after all the checks and systems go into effect. The other is that they do not know, because they cannot know. Nothing of this scale in this country has ever been tried before…and it still leaves a lot of people without insurance. No one can know because no one, not politicians, can predict the future. Who knows what advancements and things might pop up?
Which will probably mean medical advancement is going to come to a standstill in order to prevent costs from rising.
Oh and that is not even adding on competition to this debate, which the government will virtually be a monopoly…and those only drive up prices and the eventual costs of things.
And that is not even taking account of the simple odd fact that under the proposed legislation, we will not be seeing the benefits for this bill for years…but will be paying for it now.
That is insane. In all aspects of our society when we pay for something, we are expecting to get immediate returns…except for perhaps in investing.
Even when you put money down on a house or a car you still expect to get that car or house to use. And then only if you fail to keep up with your payments, then it is taken from you because you failed to live up to your obligation. But that’s it, we are not even going to be seeing what this is going to do for us,until after the next Presidential election…maybe.
Second, the issue of the death panel has caused the most serious issue that has effected the debate for everyone in this, its one of the most vicious, with the rationing of care, that to give care to all, some might not get the care that they need.
That some citizens might be considered more valuable to society then others in that society, because they have to give that care to those people, in order for that society to survive. That they can contribute the most to that society.
Now private companies and organizations when they have done this in the past have been called out on it, they have had protests against them, and they have been forced to change, and rightfully so. But yet, when governments do this, it is for the good of the people, and the true extent of this will be hidden from us, to only the most bold can ever find it.
And rationing has already started happening, with the mammograms, a government organization that I cannot recall the name of has stated that a report that they released around six months ago is now wrong, and that you can get care later in your life, and less often.
But its a short jump from that, to actually mandating it on the society that you live in, to help lower costs that extra bit more.
Because if your health insurance was yours…and not dictated by the government, you could do that as often as you want, and can afford, and not risk doing it on someone else’s dime, or someone telling you it costs too much so you absolutely cannot do it.
Finally, something has been bothering me, and I made this point…but I have heard it nowhere else.
The congressmen who support this, Barrack Obama, and others, they are all out there, saying that this will increase freedom, increase options, and increase your ‘right’ to health care. That health care is a right to the people and it needs to be provided for by others. That society, as a whole must pay for that with what you cannot provide for yourself.
But yet, I have heard it said, from a variety of sources, that there are punishments in this health care bill. That you will either be fined…or that there is a part of this legislation that if you do not pay for this, if you do not buy health care insurance at all, then you will be jailed for it.
Now, how is that a right? The whole point of rights is that you can exercise them, or not, to suit yourself. No one speaks exactly the same, everyone speaks different. We have the right to assemble, but we often do not…and only with people of our choosing, that we do not have to assemble.
How about the right to bare arms? Not everyone owns a means to defend themselves, or chose to do so.
The right to not be searched and seized? Some people when they have nothing to hide can allow themselves to be searched.
All of these rights one can exercise themselves to the fullest extent of whatever they want to, or not want to.
This clearly is not in the health care intention, they are not making it a right.
Then what are they making it into? They are making it into a mandate, that you have to buy something for yourself that you may or may not want or need.
And, plus, if that was not enough, only a certain percentage of the population will pay for the health care of others, if you do have the perfect health care, and you do not switch jobs, and you are able under all the provisions to keep your health care, then you will still have to pay, and be taxed higher for it, for your good health care…because you do have health care, in order to pay for someone who does not have exactly what you have.
Now this provides another crisis in ethics: That the job of taxation, and government is to provide goods and services for the benefit of everyone. The postal service, military, transportation systems, and others, they are all provided because they benefit everyone pretty much equally. Oh and if you want to use a bus system provided for the state…you have to pay for it.
But not with health care…everyone will be paying for everyone’s health care, if they want it or not. That they themselves might never see the benefits of what they are doling out cash for.
Which leads to the final issue with this, with this being a potential mandate, and a near monopoly this leads to something else I have been debating out with people.
In a recent debate I was asked: Don’t you think its odd that America is the only western power without…I think it was health care…not sure.
My answer being obvious, I will not go into it.
What this brings up is everyone is different, every country has different ways of doing things, of treating its people, and what the people expect from their government.
If you like he NHS that is fine with me, but that does not change the real and serious concerns I have about the current bill that is being proposed by Congress. It is not for me, and I do not think it will work for many Americans.
There is no one size fits all system, and this shockingly seems to be attempting to do just that.
The answer to this conundrum to me is more, more competition, more options, truly, not creating a government system that will run everything, but having individualized plans for the individual.
If they like their healthcare that is fine.
If they like healthcare insurance companies, that is fine. And good and right for them
If they go through their employer that is fine.
If they want to set up a plan between them and their doctor, no paperwork, no middlemen, just a base plan, then that is fine. Whatever the individual wants, coupled with real TORT reform, and that would be great. The individual should be the only one that determines what kind of care they should strive for.
Even up to a government option, as long as what that is. But I still get leery of governments saying they will give you the option to do something or not,because today’s governments seem hell-bent on turning options into mandates.
As long as you have the ability to pay, and the want to pay, you should be able to. And that again included the government option. If you want it, then you should be able to get it…and then pay for it yourself.
This is what I believe anyways, I welcome your opinion, you can comment, you can write me, I do not care whether you agree with me or not. Let us have the debate. Show me where I am wrong, because I do not especially like thinking that the USA government can be capable of doing death panels, or all this other stuff. It is our obligation to question what we hear.